Most AI evaluation fails in one of two ways: it accepts a launch claim at face value, or it tests a demo without pricing the retries, review, and failure modes that appear in production.
The ResearchAudio Evidence Lab now includes a four-test starter kit, sixteen browser-local tools, and twenty-one deployment and cost field notes for engineers, product teams, and technical leaders. Most resources require no login; the complete starter kit opens after a free ResearchAudio signup. Each resource turns one vague AI claim into a concrete inspection, cost model, capacity plan, or copy-ready configuration.
Choose the question you need to answer
Decision | Instrument | Output |
|---|---|---|
Is the launch claim supported? | Launch Evidence Scorecard | A 0–7 evidence classification |
What does one successful task really cost? | AI Cost Calculator | Retry-adjusted cost per success |
Can the agent stop and recover safely? | Agent Loop Diagnostic | A 0–10 guardrail score |
Does the automation pay back? | AI Agent ROI Calculator | Monthly savings and payback period |
What will the LLM API traffic cost? | LLM API Cost Calculator | Monthly token budget with caching and retries |
When does prompt caching save money? | Prompt Caching Cost Calculator | Monthly savings and break-even hit rate |
How should Codex load project instructions? | Codex CLI config.toml Generator | Copy-ready fallback and byte-limit settings |
Where does voice response latency come from? | Voice AI Latency Calculator | Parallel and sequential first-audio budgets |
Will this LLM fit in available GPU memory? | LLM GPU Memory Calculator | Weight VRAM, headroom, and minimum GPU count |
What does each resolved voice AI call cost? | AI Voice Agent Cost Calculator | Loaded cost after failures and human handoffs |
How much memory does the KV cache use? | LLM KV Cache Calculator | Per-token, per-sequence, concurrency, and GQA memory |
Is the benchmark result reproducible? | AI Benchmark Audit Checklist | A 0–12 protocol completeness score |
Does the task have a usable error signal? | AI Task Fit Diagnostic | An execution-ready or human-jump classification |
1. Audit the launch evidence
The AI Launch Evidence Scorecard checks seven things that should exist before a team treats an announcement as decision-ready: real access, a falsifiable claim, a named baseline, visible operating cost, documented failure cases, reproducible methods, and a dated evidence owner.
Use it before a proof of concept, procurement review, or launch write-up. A low score is not a verdict against the product. It is a precise list of evidence still missing.
2. Calculate cost per successful AI task
Per-token pricing hides the number that matters in production. The AI Cost per Successful Task Calculator combines model cost, task success rate, retry limits, human review time, and labor cost.
The result separates cheap attempts from cheap outcomes. That distinction becomes important when a workflow succeeds only after multiple runs or requires a person to inspect every result.
3. Diagnose the agent loop
An agent can look capable while its control loop remains unsafe. The AI Agent Loop Diagnostic checks ten production guardrails, including machine-checkable success, capped retries, validation, checkpoints, budgets, escalation, termination tests, and retained traces.
Run it against one real workflow. Planned controls do not count. The score shows whether the loop is blind, exposed, bounded, or controlled.
4. Stress-test the business case
The AI Agent ROI Calculator estimates successful automated tasks, gross labor value, review cost, run cost, recurring platform cost, monthly net savings, and implementation payback.
It is designed to expose fragile automation plans. If the return disappears after realistic failure and review assumptions, the correct next step is a smaller pilot, not a larger forecast.
5. Budget the LLM API traffic
Published prices per million tokens do not include your traffic shape. The LLM API Cost Calculator combines monthly requests, input and output tokens, current provider rates, prompt-cache savings, retry overhead, and attached per-request charges.
Use it before choosing a model or approving a traffic forecast. The worked budgeting guide explains the formula and the production metrics to pull from logs.
6. Test prompt caching economics
The Prompt Caching Cost Calculator prices cache hits at the cache-read rate and misses at the cache-write rate, then compares the total with an uncached reusable-input baseline. It reports monthly savings and the cache hit rate required to break even.
Use current provider prices and an observed production hit rate where possible. The worked prompt caching guide explains the formula, an illustrative scenario, and the inputs to pull from traces and billing data.
7. Generate the Codex project-doc config
The Codex CLI config.toml Generator builds project_doc_fallback_filenames and project_doc_max_bytes settings while preserving the priority of AGENTS.md.
Select common instruction filenames, add a repository-specific fallback, choose the byte limit, and copy the generated snippet. Invalid paths are ignored and no repository data leaves the browser.
8. Budget voice AI latency
The Voice AI Latency Calculator separates endpointing, transcript finalization, model branches, TTS, and playout. It compares a parallel fast-and-slow path with a sequential baseline so you can optimize the stage that actually owns the silence.
9. Size LLM GPU memory
The LLM GPU Memory Calculator combines model weights, optional architecture-aware KV cache, runtime headroom, usable VRAM, and minimum GPU count. It is an early capacity check, not a throughput guarantee.
10. Calculate KV-cache capacity
The LLM KV Cache Calculator turns layers, KV heads, head dimension, context, concurrency, and cache precision into memory per token, per sequence, and in total. It also compares GQA with full multi-head attention.
11. Calculate voice AI cost per resolved call
The AI Voice Agent Cost Calculator carries platform, telephony, STT, TTS, LLM, fixed fees, failed resolutions, and human handoffs into one loaded outcome cost. Replace the example inputs with current invoices and measured resolution data.
Voice AI economics field notes
Start with the five usage meters, then carry fixed fees, resolution quality, and human handoffs into the outcome cost.
70B GPU requirements
A 70B model does not have one VRAM number. Compare INT4, INT8, and FP16 while holding an illustrative 32K KV-cache profile constant, then replace every architecture and hardware input with your own.
Qwen2.5 GPU requirements
Compare 7B, 32B, and 72B across INT4, INT8, and BF16, with exact 32K KV cache and the 128K context jump. Each scenario opens with the calculator assumptions already loaded.
Instrument 12 · benchmark protocol
Audit the score before you trust the leaderboard
Check the model snapshot, scaffold, budgets, grader, task distribution, uncertainty, failure artifacts, cost, and latency behind any benchmark claim.
Instrument 13 · task framing
Does your AI task have an error signal?
Separate work with a defined target and independent judge from work that still asks the model to invent the premise.
AI agent security checklist
Inspect twelve enforceable controls for goal hijacking, least privilege, approval gates, sandboxing, untrusted input, tool and MCP provenance, secrets, validation, resource limits, audit trails, shutdown, and recovery.
Find the right model for your GPU
Start with the hardware you already have, then open a model-specific worksheet for exact precision, context, and multi-GPU scenarios.
Choose a hardware-specific capacity guide:
RTX 4060 8GB for the Qwen3 8B context boundary.
RTX 3060 12GB for the 8B-to-14B boundary.
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB for the variant check and narrow 14B lane.
RTX 3090 vs RTX 4090 for the same-24GB capacity decision and workload benchmark boundary.
RTX 4090 24GB for Qwen3 30B-A3B and 32B context checks.
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB vs 16GB for the model and context ceiling created by doubled VRAM.
RTX 5080 16GB for the narrow Qwen3 14B and gpt-oss-20b boundary.
RTX 5090 32GB for the Qwen3 32B and 128K gpt-oss boundary.
What LLM can I run? finds the largest listed model tier for your available VRAM, while the local LLM GPU compatibility checker compares common GPUs and precisions.
Compare deployment requirements for DeepSeek V4 Flash, GLM-5.2, and Kimi K3.
Size multimodal and diffusion workloads with the Gemma 4 and DiffusionGemma field notes.
The recommended evaluation sequence
Evidence: verify that the product claim is testable and supported.
Token budget: model traffic, input and output length, and retries.
Cache economics: price cache reads and writes, then calculate the break-even hit rate.
Task economics: calculate cost per successful outcome after retries and review.
Control loop: inspect termination, validation, recovery, and escalation.
Business case: stress-test savings and implementation payback.
Developer setup: generate the Codex project-instruction configuration.
Voice latency: trace every stage between the user finishing and first audio.
GPU fit: estimate weight memory, headroom, and minimum device count.
KV cache: calculate per-token memory, full-context capacity, concurrency, and GQA savings.
Voice economics: price each AI-resolved call after failures and handoffs.
Benchmark protocol: verify the model snapshot, scaffold, budget, grader, uncertainty, artifacts, cost, and latency.
Task fit: confirm that the target, independent judge, feedback cadence, bounds, and premise owner exist.
Completing all thirteen instruments takes about forty minutes. The guided starter kit covers the four core evaluation steps. Your inputs and progress stay in your browser.
Frequently asked questions
What is AI evaluation?
AI evaluation is the process of testing a system against explicit evidence, cost, reliability, and outcome criteria. A useful evaluation connects model behavior to the real task, constraints, and failure conditions a team will face.
Are these AI evaluation tools free?
Yes. The browser-local tools are free, require no account, and keep calculator inputs and diagnostic progress on your device.
Do the calculators upload my data?
No. The current Evidence Lab instruments keep calculator inputs and diagnostic progress in the browser.
How should I calculate AI agent ROI?
Start with successful automated tasks, not total attempts. Subtract human review, run cost, recurring platform cost, and implementation cost before calculating payback.
What should I test before deploying an AI agent?
At minimum, test success criteria, retry limits, output validation, failure classification, checkpointing, cost and latency budgets, human escalation, termination behavior, and trace retention.
Get the evidence behind the next AI headline
ResearchAudio gives more than 51,000 builders concise, source-led briefings on model launches, research, tools, and the economics behind them.
Go deeper on the economics
Use the full calculation guides to define defensible inputs before you open the tools.
AI agent ROI after failure and review
Model coverage, successful automation, review labor, recurring operations, implementation cost, and payback.
AI cost per successful task
Calculate retry-adjusted cost using attempt spend, success probability, retry limits, and human review.
